<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five ingredients for a see-through newspaper</title>
	<link>http://www.joethink.com/blog/2007/04/five-ingredients-for-a-see-through-newspaper/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on building relevance, online storytelling, and local journalism</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 00:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.joethink.com/blog/2007/04/five-ingredients-for-a-see-through-newspaper/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 05:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.joethink.com/blog/2007/04/five-ingredients-for-a-see-through-newspaper/#comment-430</guid>
		<description>Anna, I see the want-to-hide cruft newsrooms have falling in the category of journalists' (inside) sources ... I guess it's possible there's nasty stuff in the details of stories that never ran, or business deals involving significant others of newsroom management, but that's just a guess on the types of stuff newsrooms would hide. If newsrooms had stuff to hide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anna, I see the want-to-hide cruft newsrooms have falling in the category of journalists&#8217; (inside) sources &#8230; I guess it&#8217;s possible there&#8217;s nasty stuff in the details of stories that never ran, or business deals involving significant others of newsroom management, but that&#8217;s just a guess on the types of stuff newsrooms would hide. If newsrooms had stuff to hide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna Haynes</title>
		<link>http://www.joethink.com/blog/2007/04/five-ingredients-for-a-see-through-newspaper/#comment-331</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna Haynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 16:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.joethink.com/blog/2007/04/five-ingredients-for-a-see-through-newspaper/#comment-331</guid>
		<description>"I don’t think many newsrooms have much to hide"

Are you sure?
(perhaps you're right, if we exclude what goes on with the editorial pages.  But it sounds unlikely to me - IMO any influential enterprise without oversight is going to accumulate some ugly cruft.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I don’t think many newsrooms have much to hide&#8221;</p>
<p>Are you sure?<br />
(perhaps you&#8217;re right, if we exclude what goes on with the editorial pages.  But it sounds unlikely to me - IMO any influential enterprise without oversight is going to accumulate some ugly cruft.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Invisible Inkling &#187; The easy route to online newspaper transparency</title>
		<link>http://www.joethink.com/blog/2007/04/five-ingredients-for-a-see-through-newspaper/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Invisible Inkling &#187; The easy route to online newspaper transparency</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.joethink.com/blog/2007/04/five-ingredients-for-a-see-through-newspaper/#comment-314</guid>
		<description>[...] Joe Murphy offers newspapers five ways to be a little less opaque online. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Joe Murphy offers newspapers five ways to be a little less opaque online. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
